Obama Vs. The Senate
First Posted: 01-28-10 10:30 AM – HuffingtonPost
In his first formal State of the Union address, President Obama demonstrated a thinly-veiled annoyance with the parliamentary structure and lethargic pace of the United States Senate.
On six different occasions, the president called out the chamber for essentially being a cooling saucer for legislative activity and a house of political prima donnas.
On a jobs bill, he urged the Senate to follow the House’s lead. On education reform, he demanded much the same. On comprehensive energy and climate change legislation, Obama noted that the House had completed its work and expressed his eagerness “to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate.”
Obama Versus The Senate
On a commission to help reign in the debt, he chastised the Senate for voting down a bill and pledged to set one up through executive order.
Those were just the policy critiques. Obama also chastised “a few individual senators” for holding “well-qualified public servants” hostage over “pet projects or grudges” (see: DeMint, Jim or Nelson, Ben). And then he took aim at the Senate GOP: “If the Republican leadership is going to insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town, then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well.”
Taken as a whole, the slights pleased some House Democrats who have long since passed the point of frustration with their compatriots on the other side of the Capitol.
“As you know, the Republicans are the opposition but the Senate is the enemy,” Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y) told Politico shortly after the speech. “The Senate, I think, was properly chided… they’re the meat locker at this point. And so I think it was very important that the president held that up.”
Privately, of course, Senate aides were fuming at what they considered gratuitous chiding. “He might as well say, ‘I hate the Senate,’” said one Senate Democratic aide. “Reid’s probably not liking this one bit.”
Others were more aggressive than defensive, noting that the president’s message would hold a bit more weight if his own White House practiced what he preached.
“It’s interesting that he’s focused on transparency in Congress when the White House made a number of closed-door health care deals last spring,” emailed another Senate aide. “I’m looking forward to the creation of WH-SPAN for future PhRMA meetings.”
“The reason things aren’t getting done is because there is an opposition party that is more inclined to call him a socialist and ask for his birth certificate than work with him to solve the problems facing this nation,” the aide added. “Quite frankly, Obama has not been ambitious enough.”
Get FallsPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter
Know something we don’t? E-mail us at admin@fallspost.com
Read more from Huffington Post bloggers:
![]()
Richard (RJ) Eskow: Shock Doctrine in Reverse: A Week of Setbacks, A Window of Opportunity
Democrats are now faced with a choice they clearly didn’t want: forcefully reject the corporate agenda, or risk losing to opponents who can attract an unlimited flow of corporate dollars.
Sen. Bernie Sanders: Where Do We Go From Here?
The Democrats must let Obama be Obama. Bring back one of the great inspirational leaders of our time who is more than capable of taking on the powerful special interests and rallying the American people toward a progressive agenda and a more just society.
John R. MacArthur: More and More, Obama Seems a Faux Liberal
Instead of shoring up Obama’s image of goodness, liberals really should be asking, “Does the president have a conscience?” Because if he does, he’s really no better than Nixon.











An empire replacing the republic. Slavery sold as liberty. Excellence and virtue traded for mediocrity. Socialism to save capitalism.
What if we wake up one day and realize that the terrorist threat is a predictable consequence of our meddling in the affairs of others?
One thing… What’s the height of that person? Nice article!
President Obama’s Administration has DE-LISTED our NATIONAL SYMBOL: the
BALD EAGLE http://www.cctv.org/node/87533